Early in his career, John Updike announced his affinity with the
Christian existentialism of Soren Kierkegaard, Paul Tillich, Karl
Barth, and others. Because of this, many of Updike's critics have
interpreted his work from within a Christian existentialist
context. Yet Kierkegaard and Barth provide Updike with much more
than a mere context, for their dialectical thinking serves as the
springboard for Updike's own unique dialectical vision, a complex
matrix of ethical precepts, theological beliefs, and aesthetic
principles that governs nearly all of his literary output. Nowhere
else in his immense corpus is this vision more clearly and
thoroughly expressed than in his four Rabbit novels, which were
gathered into the single volume Rabbit Angstrom in 1995.
However, because Updike's critics have chosen to read the Rabbit
novels as discrete, freestanding texts, they have by and large
failed to extract the precepts of this private vision.
In John Updike's Rabbit Tetralogy, Marshall Boswell
redresses this imbalance by treating the Rabbit tetralogy as a
single, unified "mega-novel." He demonstrates that, taken together
as a single work, the four discrete sections of the tetralogy not
only provide a coherent and complete articulation of Updike's
unique existential vision but also compose a unified work of
remarkable formal complexity. Boswell brings to Updike's work the
concept of "mastered irony," a term coined by Kierkegaard to
describe the presentation of two legitimate but contradictory sides
of an issue. In the Rabbit novels, these issues range from adultery
to drug addiction, from race to redemption, with each issue
examined through the refracting lens of Updike's own ironic method.
Boswell shows that although each of the four individual Rabbit
novels confirms this dialectical strategy in a unique way, the
completed tetralogy comprises an additional series of dialectical
pairs that sustain, rather than resolve, thematic and formal
tension. Ultimately, the structure of the finished "mega-novel"
echoes the work's thematic rationale.
To help readers who are interested in a particular Rabbit novel,
Boswell devotes a chapter to each individual section of the
tetralogy. At the same time, he treats each novel as an integral
part of the more comprehensive whole. Honoring the full complexity
of Updike's provocative thinking without losing sight of the
tetralogy's popular appeal, John Updike's Rabbit Tetralogy
makes a valuable addition to the study of Updike's work.
About the Author
Marshall Boswell is Assistant Professor of English at Rhodes
College in Memphis, Tennessee.